Tom Lindmeier’s Blog @ MarketPlanB

There was a very intelligent discussion on Cord Silversteins blog titled Engage Your Customers or Die where he asks the question: “Is it a good thing for companies to try to engage their customers online? Does the good outweigh the possible repercussions that could come from it?”. The repercussions were defined as the big bad things that can happen if you do not handle every instance right.

If you read my previous post on the Invisible Visitor, I maintained that that the route to understanding our customers is engagement. Once they become visible, you are then positioned to make strategic decisions that result in major marketing breakthroughs. So the question is not “if” you should engage but rather “how”.

I struggle to understand why some businesses come to fear their customers. Any business with even the best service standards faces an onslaught of touches with customers who have problems. This constant exposure to negatives is the only reason I can come up with for this fear. Yet these same businesses understand that turning a negative into a positive is one of the best ways to to create a loyal customer. The dedication to pursue this strategy is no easy task and requires a major commitment. Maybe this fear is just a manifestation of the weariness that comes from accommodating customers with what may seem to be unrealistic expectations.

Here’s my list of engagement tactics ranked by the quality of actionable information:

1. Requests for email input on your home page and other locations in your site
2. Blog within your domain
3. Reviews
4. Online chat
5. Search and response to blogs and portals outside your domain
6. Post-transaction online surveys
7. Post-product delivery email and package insert surveys
8. General surveys to email customer base with and without incentives

Note that tactics that are “open invitations” receive the highest quality rating. General surveys are preferred by most businesses because it makes it simple to quantify data, but they are of questionable value because they do not capture fresh information. Also, users want to be in control and do not prefer to respond to your controlled format.

I have received the best quality information with the open invitation to email. Junonia.com does a wonderful job of this by posting an invitation to email the president right on the home page. This results in a large quantity of responses and it requires a lot of effort on her part to respond in a timely manner. There is also a good deal of effort that goes into distributing it throughout the organization. But the quality of this information is invaluable and because it gets you closer to understanding your customers than any other method.

The solution to building forums that work is to define the proper set of expectations that narrow the focus to product and refer users with transaction problems to customer service where issues may be resolved in a more timely manner. For instance if you build a blog, you’re much better off inviting users to engage in the product development process.

Does your experience differ from my assertion?